NEXT WEBCAST COUNTDOWN: Green Infrastructure and Green Jobs. CLICK TO REGISTER!
1 1 1 1
3 3 3 3
Days
0 0 0 0
6 6 6 6
Hours
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3
Minutes
0 0 0 0
9 9 9 9
Seconds

Effects of Stream Restoration on Nitrogen Removal and Transformation in Urban Watersheds: Lessons from Minebank Run, Baltimore, Maryland

Paul M. Mayer,a Shannon P. Schechter,b* Sujay S. Kaushal,c and Peter M. Groffmand

aResearch Ecologist, US Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division, Ada, OK

bPostdoctoral Research Associate, National Research Council, US Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division, Ada, OK, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

c Assistant Professor, Department of Geology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD

d Senior Scientist, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY

* Corresponding author

Abstract

Stream restoration is an important green infrastructure tool that may improve water quality and protect watershed function and services. Runoff from impervious surfaces and leakage from sewage infrastructure, septic systems, agricultural ditches, and tile drains creates excess nitrogen (N) in groundwater, surface water, and coastal waters, which is detrimental to human and ecosystem health. Degraded urban streams suffer from altered hydrology and biogeochemistry that can impair a stream’s capacity to process and remove excess N in stream water. This case study of Minebank Run in Baltimore, Maryland, found factors that limit the removal of excess N in degraded streams and identified restoration and management approaches that enhance N removal. We found three stream restoration strategies that can greatly improve N removal capacity: (1) increasing hydrologic residence time, (2) increasing hydrologic connectivity between the stream channel and floodplains, and (3) increasing organic carbon availability to foster denitrification “hot spots.” The findings suggest that combining approaches—such as prioritizing nonpoint N source reductions in watersheds and integrating green infrastructure with stream and floodplain wetland restoration approaches, which reduce peak flow, increase hydrologic residence time, and supply organic matter (e.g., maintaining riparian zones)—will be the most efficient way to enhance N removal and protect ecosystem services in urban streams.

Members can continue reading by logging into the Members Only Area...

blockheader.3

 
rsz 1rsz 1rsz japanese knotweed before treatment 2014-07-24
Zombie Invasion! When plants attack...
 

Read the March 2015 issue

of Runoff Rundown CLICK HERE!

 

Facts and Myths about Maryland's "Rain Tax" 
How much do you know about the stormwater fees and how they help protect our watersheds? Read the article and then check out our white paper:
The Value of Stormwater Fees in Maryland.

 

 

Need to develop an IDDE program?

Read the guidance.

 

Two versions of the Watershed Treatment Model (WTM) released to help users estimate benefits from a wide range of stormwater runoff and pollutant removal practices. Download your FREE COPY of the WTM and User's guide.